Back to Our Regularly Scheduled Programming? A 2026 Mid-Year Market Recap

When EdgeRock published its 2026 Outlook, the script for the year looked familiar: AI leaders and AI-adjacent businesses compounding earnings, inflation and the labor market behaving, and—finally—market leadership broadening beyond a handful of mega-cap technology names.

A military conflict involving Iran was not in the script.

For a few weeks this spring, it threatened to rewrite the whole thing. Then it didn’t. With a ceasefire framework holding and oil back below where it started the conflict, the noise has faded and the fundamentals are back in view. EdgeRock’s read on the rest of 2026 is straightforward: The case for risk assets survived the scare intact, and in some respects looks stronger than it did in January.

---

The Iran scare tested the economy

The conflict did what geopolitical shocks do. It spiked volatility as investors tried to price the un-priceable, with the Strait of Hormuz—the transit point for roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and a large share of its liquefied natural gas—at the center of every worst-case scenario. Any sustained disruption there would have pushed energy prices, inflation expectations, and uncertainty higher together.

For a stretch, that is exactly what happened. Oil prices climbed, pulling headline inflation up with them. The yield curve steepened as bond investors repriced inflation risk and the path of policy. The dollar firmed as markets not only abandoned hopes for rate cuts but briefly entertained the possibility of additional tightening—prediction-market traders at one point put better-than-even odds on a 2026 hike.

But then a ceasefire framework and renewed negotiations defused the most acute fears, and oil has since fallen to its lowest level since before the war began. It is too early to call the resolution durable. But investors have already shifted their attention back to the earnings and growth fundamentals that were driving markets before the first headline—and EdgeRock has done the same.

---

A broader market is a sturdier market

The clearest piece of good news is what the rally now looks like under the hood. The S&P 500 is up roughly 9% year-to-date, and—more to the point—international developed and U.S. small-cap stocks have done even better.

That is healthier than it sounds, and it is worth being precise about why. When an index climbs on the backs of a few names, the index quietly becomes a leveraged bet on those names. Entering this year, the ten largest companies in the S&P 500 accounted for roughly 40% of the entire index—the most lopsided the market had been since 1998 and 1999. At that level of concentration, the “market” is not really the market. It is seven or eight stocks wearing a 500-company costume. When they stumble, there is nothing underneath to catch the fall.

Market technicians have a name for the thing to watch here: Breadth, often tracked through the advance-decline line—the running tally of how many stocks are rising versus falling. Healthy bull markets show broad participation, with the average stock climbing alongside the index. Dangerous ones show the opposite, where the headline index grinds to new highs while the advance-decline line quietly rolls over because fewer and fewer names are doing the work.

History is blunt on what narrow leadership tends to precede. In the early 1970s, a cohort of blue-chip darlings nicknamed the Nifty Fifty—Coca-Cola, Xerox, Polaroid, Disney, McDonald’s—carried the market in a “two-tier” rally while everything else languished. The reckoning was brutal: In the 1973–1974 bear market, Coca-Cola fell 69%, Disney 87%, and Polaroid 91%. The pattern rhymed in 1999, when the top names swelled to multi-decade weights and market breadth deteriorated for the better part of a year before the index itself broke. In both cases, the problem was never that the leaders were bad businesses. The problem was that too few of them were holding up the whole structure.

That is exactly the risk a broadening market defuses. As small-caps, international equities, and the long-ignored middle of the S&P 500 begin to participate, the bull market stops resting on a handful of load-bearing columns and starts resting on a foundation. The leaders do not have to fall for breadth to matter—they simply stop being the only thing standing between investors and a correction. EdgeRock reads the rotation underway in 2026 not as a rebuke of the mega-caps, but as the market widening its base. Breadth is not a sideshow to this bull market. It is the foundation.

---

The AI capex debate is being framed wrong

No question has consumed more investor attention than the sheer scale of capital flooding into AI infrastructure. Spending is on track to clear more than $500 billion in 2026 alone, and the natural reaction is to ask whether this is a bubble or a rational bet on a genuine technological shift. EdgeRock’s view is that the question is usually posed incorrectly.

The test is not whether AI conjures a trillion-dollar standalone industry overnight. It is whether hyperscalers can earn returns on invested capital above their cost of capital. If AI makes existing businesses meaningfully more productive—lowering costs, sharpening advertising, deepening software monetization, opening new revenue lines—the value created is enormous. Incremental gains across Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google could add hundreds of billions in enterprise value without requiring consumers to change their behavior at all.

That is why EdgeRock does not see a broad speculative bubble. Pockets of the market have clearly run ahead of fundamentals—parts of the semiconductor and memory supply chain look stretched in the short term. But the thesis ultimately rests on the returns these investments generate, not the dollars going in. The likely outcome sits somewhere between the loudest bulls and the loudest bears—which is usually where reality lives.

---

Software disruption is real, but the fear is overdone

AI is not only a tailwind. It has unsettled corners of the software industry, where doubts about the durability of certain business models have compressed valuations in both public and private markets. Those doubts have bled into private credit, where a wave of technology debt issued in the cheap-money years of 2021 through 2023 is now coming due. As borrowers line up to refinance, lenders are demanding lower valuations and tighter terms.

EdgeRock expects this pressure to persist—and also expects much of the alarm to prove overstated. Technological disruption manufactures uncertainty, but it manufactures opportunity in the same motion. Over time, debt and equity investors will draw a sharper line between businesses whose moats AI widens and those whose models it erodes. The spread between those two groups is where the next few years of returns will be won or lost.

---

The IPO window is reopening—and it looks nothing like 2021

An underappreciated tailwind is stirring in the new-issue market. After years of high rates, compressed valuations, and a near-frozen calendar, the IPO market is reopening. What matters is how different this cycle looks from the last one. The 2021 pipeline ran on speculation and growth-at-any-cost stories. Today’s is stacked with higher-quality businesses—stronger balance sheets, more durable models, and visible paths to profitability.

A healthy IPO market pays dividends well beyond the companies going public. It widens the opportunity set, improves market breadth, hands private investors a long-awaited exit, and relieves refinancing and liquidity pressure across private equity and private credit. Historically, strong issuance has tracked alongside solid growth, rising confidence, and healthy capital formation. EdgeRock does not expect a return to 2021’s excesses, and would not welcome one. A gradual normalization, though, would be a genuinely constructive development for public and private markets alike.

---

Inflation is the variable that still demands watching

The Iran shock left a mark on prices. Headline inflation rose to 4.2% in May, its highest reading in three years, driven overwhelmingly by energy. The encouraging detail sits underneath: Core inflation, which strips out food and energy, actually cooled to 2.9%. With crude already retreating from its conflict-driven highs, EdgeRock is cautiously optimistic that headline and core inflation can stabilize or drift lower in the back half of the year.

The most powerful counterweight may be productivity. According to First Trust, output per hour has grown at a 2.7% annualized rate over the past three years—well above its long-run average. If AI-driven productivity gains keep showing up in the data, they can absorb inflationary pressure, ease the case for further tightening, and support growth without stoking imbalances. For businesses and financial assets alike, that is close to an ideal backdrop.

---

The labor market is cooling, not cracking

The job market remains stubbornly resilient. Hiring has slowed from its post-pandemic sprint, but unemployment is still low by historical standards and layoffs stay contained—jobless claims fell again in the latest week, a fresh sign that employers are holding onto workers. Hiring has grown more selective, yet most people with jobs continue to see steady wages and stable conditions.

The consumer picture is more textured. Higher-income households are riding strong asset prices, rising home equity, and healthy wage growth. Lower- and middle-income households are still squeezed by stubborn costs for housing, insurance, healthcare, and food. That split is the now-familiar “K-shaped economy,” where the same data describes two very different lived realities. Even so, aggregate spending has held up. Sentiment surveys keep flashing anxiety, but actual spending and labor data keep describing an economy that is fundamentally sound.

---

The balance of evidence still favors risk assets

Add it up and the rest of 2026 looks constructive. Geopolitical risk is dissipating, earnings keep growing, the labor market is healthy, spending is resilient, productivity is improving, and AI investment continues to feed economic activity. Broader market participation and a reopening IPO window suggest leadership can keep widening beyond a small club of mega-cap technology stocks.

The risks are real and worth naming. Inflation could prove stickier than hoped, geopolitical tensions could flare again, and the ultimate payoff from AI investment is still unknown. But weighed against the strength of corporate balance sheets, the momentum in earnings, the pace of innovation, and the economy’s demonstrated resilience, the balance of evidence still points one direction. EdgeRock remains constructive on equities through the remainder of 2026.